Adjacency Research Program · Hardware Program

Build + fund the test

An execution roadmap from today to independent replication. We have designed the scoreboard. We have not built the machine.

physical evidence: NONEhardware test: NOT YET RUNmetrology protocol: FROZEN-DRAFT v1.0simulation pipeline: INTERNALLY VALIDATED (SYNTHETIC)toy architecture: CONDITIONAL / UNRESOLVED

Investor briefing · current frontier

Fund the experiment that can tell us whether distance has another layer.

Adjacency Theory is not selling a portal. It is building a staged research program that can reject conventional explanations, measure a candidate relational effect, and unlock engineering only after independent replication.

Phase 1 · activePhase 2 · investor gatedPhase 3 · shadow design onlyPhysical evidence · none

Theoretical end-state visual · contingent

EARTH · A

Prepared, authenticated endpoint

MARS · B

Prepared, authenticated endpoint

relational channel?

Vision only. The channel, endpoint law, energy scale, capacity, and transport mechanism remain unobserved.

Seven walls broken in shadow engineering

S3-0G

Atomic transfer

Interrupted exchange must fail closed: never duplicate, corrupt, or blindly retry an unresolved state.

S3-0H

Destination authenticity

Coordinates nominate a target; post-arm physical fingerprints must authenticate the prepared endpoint.

S3-0I

Moving registration

Identity may survive motion, but it cannot prove astronomical location without witnessed enrollment.

S3-0J

Time + causal order

Single-clock round trips avoid distant simultaneity assumptions in the primary causal test.

S3-0K

Loop prevention

Any usable beyond-light-cone channel needs an acyclic relational order or an equivalent signaling restriction.

S3-0L

Observable signature

A preferred hidden order predicts a phase-stable sidereal pattern—not merely a daily fluctuation.

S3-0M

Campaign sensitivity

A one-year, multi-lab program turns the prediction into a funded falsification campaign.

Capital converts uncertainty into evidence

01 · PHASE 1

Freeze the law

Complete theory closure, preregistration, coupons, controls, and independent technical review.

02 · PHASE 2

Measure reality

Build the Golden Rig, run blinded physical tests, publish raw data, and fund independent replication.

03 · PHASE 3

Engineer only what survives

Scale observable transfer first; prepared portal pairs and vehicles remain gated behind replicated evidence.

Returns for humanity · scenario map

Science

A decisive null result constrains emergent-geometry models; a replicated anomaly opens a new experimental domain.

Space

Long-term ambition: prepared Earth–Moon and Earth–Mars endpoint pairs after observable transfer is proven and independently replicated.

Infrastructure

Precision timing, isolation, fault-tolerant transfer, calibration, and distributed metrology can produce nearer-term technical value.

Humanity

The ultimate vision is to reduce distance as a barrier to exploration, knowledge, resources, and connection—if nature permits it.

The investment is in disciplined discovery.

We are seeking capital, experimental physics leadership, precision-metrology partners, independent replication laboratories, and an investor-appointed technical review board.

Open investor dialogue →

01 · Mission

Build the smallest auditable Golden Metrology Rig capable of testing whether post-arming unpredictable information can be decoded at endpoint B before the conservative lower bound of every inventoried physical causal path between A and B. Smallest, because every additional component is another unaudited channel. Auditable, because the claim is only as strong as the channel inventory behind it. The expected outcome is no anomaly or an architecture effect; the programme is designed so that outcome is still valuable.

Imagination chooses the question; measurement chooses the answer.

02 · System architecture

ENDPOINT A

→

HW ENTROPY / PAYLOAD ENCODER

→

LOCAL FPGA + TIMESTAMP

→

16-NODE OSCILLATOR SUBSTRATE

→

SELECTABLE DELAY BANK (OPTICAL / ELECTRICAL)

→

ENDPOINT B DECODER + TIMESTAMP

TIMING SYSTEM A

Independent reference + TDC at endpoint A.

TIMING SYSTEM B

Independent reference at B. Different calibration model to A.

DAQ — OFFLINE / BLINDED

No live control path. Raw unsmoothed capture, hashed.

RF + POWER ISOLATION

Shielded enclosures, filtered feedthroughs, separate supplies.

ENVIRONMENTAL SENSORS

Temperature, voltage and drift logging throughout every run.

HIDDEN-SHORTCUT INJECTION FIXTURE

Deliberate bypass installer used as a positive control against the audit.

Schematic of a proposed apparatus. Nothing shown here has been built.

03 · Golden Rig vs Engineering Rig

GOLDEN METROLOGY RIG

Minimal, auditable, and frozen for the duration of evidence collection. Firmware, analysis and topology are hashed. It is never optimised, never upgraded mid-campaign, and never modified before its baseline is archived and reproduced. Its only job is to be believable.

ENGINEERING RIG

Forked only after verification clears, and only ever as a separate machine. This is where optimisation, scaling, IP and productisation live. Work here can never feed back into the Golden Rig while a campaign is open.

04 · Build phases B0 – B8

Each phase also carries full stage-gate QA — entry criteria, procedure, raw outputs, acceptance, failure and re-test rules, responsible role, hashes and calibration IDs — on the process validation page, alongside the synthetic campaign sanity tests.

Process validation →

B0 · Clock loopback

planned

Inputs: Two endpoint FPGAs, both timing stacks, short reference cable.
Test: Timestamp a signal that leaves and returns along a known path; compare both timing systems against each other and against themselves over hours.
Pass criteria: Both stacks agree within stated uncertainty; drift characterised and logged; no unexplained offset.
Failure response: Stop. No later phase means anything until the clocks are trustworthy. Rebuild the timing chain, not the experiment.
People: Timing/metrology lead, FPGA engineer.
Equipment: 2x FPGA endpoints, White Rabbit-class references, independent time-interval instrument.
Deliverable: Timing uncertainty budget measured on our hardware, not quoted from datasheets.

B1 · Post-arming entropy and decode

planned

Inputs: Hardware TRNG at A, decoder at B, arming sequence.
Test: Generate an unpredictable payload only after arming; verify it decodes at B over an ordinary path; log entropy health and hash the payload at creation.
Pass criteria: Decode success above the preregistered error threshold; payload demonstrably unpredictable before generation; entropy health nominal.
Failure response: Fix the payload chain. A correlation without a decode is not information and will never count.
People: FPGA/embedded lead, statistician.
Equipment: Hardware TRNG, encoder/decoder firmware, raw capture.
Deliverable: Validated information-transfer primitive with a frozen decode rule.

B2 · Delay bank calibration and drift

planned

Inputs: Selectable fibre spools / delay lines, environmental sensors.
Test: Characterise every delay segment bidirectionally, across temperature and over time; OTDR every fibre; repeat with spools swapped.
Pass criteria: Group delay known per segment with conservative uncertainty; drift bounded and logged; nominal length never used as an input.
Failure response: Re-characterise or replace the segment. An uncalibrated delay is the fastest route to a false anomaly.
People: Metrology lead, RF/EMI engineer.
Equipment: 1 km-class SMF spools, matched transceivers, OTDR, thermal logging.
Deliverable: Calibrated delay bank with per-setting empirical envelope.

B3 · Hidden-shortcut detection challenge

planned

Inputs: Deliberate bypass injection fixture; blinded operator.
Test: A colleague secretly installs conventional bypasses. The channel-inventory and audit pipeline must find every one before unblinding.
Pass criteria: 100% detection. Anything less and the apparatus is not able to support any claim.
Failure response: Hard stop. Extend the inventory, add RF/optical leakage scans, repeat until detection is total.
People: RF/EMI engineer, red-team statistician, facility partner.
Equipment: Shielded enclosures, RF scanner, optical leakage detection, injection fixture.
Deliverable: Audit pipeline with a demonstrated 100% detection record on known positives.

B4 · Ordinary C0 propagation

planned

Inputs: 16-node oscillator substrate, conventional routing.
Test: Measure ordinary transport across the substrate under the strongest permitted conventional signalling; build the empirical minimum-over-paths bound D_tau.
Pass criteria: Reproducible baseline consistent across sessions with a conservative lower-confidence bound.
Failure response: The substrate is not characterised. No comparison is possible without a baseline.
People: Experimental physicist, FPGA lead.
Equipment: Custom 16-node oscillator/coupling PCB, DAQ.
Deliverable: Empirical causal envelope D_tau for the apparatus as built.

B5 · Nonlinear / moving-front analogue

planned

Inputs: Substrate driven into the nonlinear regime; two-phase control.
Test: Run the moving-front architecture and measure transport relative to the ordinary route C0.
Pass criteria: A reproducible architecture effect relative to C0. This is an ARCHITECTURE result and carries NO causal claim whatsoever.
Failure response: Record the negative result and publish it. The programme has published every failure so far.
People: Nonlinear dynamics expert, experimental physicist.
Equipment: Substrate, control firmware, DAQ.
Deliverable: Characterised analogue transport behaviour, explicitly bounded by D_tau.

B6 · Blinded mixed controls

planned

Inputs: Randomised run schedule mixing real, null, sham and bypass conditions.
Test: Operators and analysts are blind to condition; the frozen analysis assigns verdicts without knowing labels.
Pass criteria: Verdicts match conditions at the preregistered rate; no condition leaks through operator behaviour.
Failure response: The blinding is broken. Redesign the run protocol before any confirmatory data.
People: Independent statistician, full team.
Equipment: Blinding harness, sealed condition schedule.
Deliverable: Demonstrated blinded pipeline ready for a confirmatory campaign.

B7 · Frozen confirmatory causal-bound campaign

gated

Inputs: All prior phases passed; firmware, analysis and protocol hashed.
Test: The full delay-amplified test across multiple delay settings, with cable-swap nulls, topology permutation and dual timing.
Pass criteria: Delta = D_tau,lower − T_decode,upper positive by the preregistered guard band at every delay setting, with all quality gates green.
Failure response: Report NO ANOMALY or ARCHITECTURE EFFECT — the expected and entirely publishable outcome.
People: Full team plus external observer.
Equipment: Complete Golden Rig.
Deliverable: A published dataset with hashes, whatever it says.

B8 · Independently assembled second apparatus

gated

Inputs: Published protocol and parts specification only.
Test: A second rig, built from the spec rather than cloned, runs the same frozen campaign.
Pass criteria: Preregistered result reproduced with no re-tuning.
Failure response: The first result was apparatus-specific. That is a finding, and it is reported as one.
People: Second team, facility partner.
Equipment: Full second rig.
Deliverable: Replication dataset, or a documented failure to replicate.

05 · Hardware & bill of materials

Category	Item	Note	Cost / status
Endpoints	Two independent FPGA endpoint boards	Separate power domains, separate timestamp hardware, no shared control bus during a run.	~$2.5k subtotal (from our current BOM)
Timing	White Rabbit-class timing references	Reference architecture for distributed sub-ns synchronisation. Performance must be established on our hardware.	REQUEST QUOTE
Timing	Independent calibrated time-interval instrumentation	Second stack with a different calibration model — deliberately not sharing the reference chain.	REQUEST QUOTE / PARTNER FACILITY
Payload	Hardware TRNG	Post-arming payload generation with entropy health monitoring.	REQUEST QUOTE
Delay	1 km-class single-mode fibre delay spools / selectable delay bank	Multiple switchable segments so delay scaling is a configuration change, not a rebuild.	REQUEST QUOTE
Delay	Matched optical transceivers	Characterised bidirectionally; asymmetry is a first-class error term.	REQUEST QUOTE
Substrate	Custom 16-node electronic oscillator / coupling PCB	Programmable weighted, directed coupling. Requires design, fabrication and revision cycles.	DESIGN REQUIRED
Isolation	RF shield enclosures and filtered feedthroughs	Directly gates B3. Under-specifying here invalidates everything downstream.	REQUEST QUOTE
Isolation	Isolated / battery power domains	Separate supplies per island, or fully characterised coupling.	REQUEST QUOTE
Environment	Temperature and environment sensing	Continuous logging; timing claims without environmental records are not auditable.	REQUEST QUOTE
Data	Raw DAQ and storage	Offline and blinded; raw waveforms preserved unsmoothed with published hashes.	REQUEST QUOTE
Calibration	Calibration standards and cabling	Traceable standards, OTDR access, matched and characterised cable set.	REQUEST QUOTE / PARTNER FACILITY

06 · Capital plan — planning envelopes

Budget A

Partner-Assisted MVP

$75k – $150k

Leans on university or national-lab metrology where available. We supply endpoints, substrate and protocol; the partner supplies timing instrumentation, fibre plant and calibration.

Reaches: B0 through B3, and B5 if facility time allows.

Budget B

Independent Golden Rig

$250k – $400k

Dedicated instrumentation and personnel. Own timing stacks, own delay bank, own shielding, no dependency on a host facility's schedule.

Reaches: B0 through B7 — a complete frozen confirmatory campaign.

Budget C

Replication + Engineering Program

$1.0m – $1.6m

Second independently assembled rig, external replication support, custom PCB and firmware revisions, IP work, publication, and the engineering fork.

Reaches: B8 and the Tier 2 handoff, if and only if the verification ladder clears.

07 · Use of funds — $305,000 Phase I target

Scientific & engineering personnel30% · $91,500
Metrology, timing, fibre, instrumentation25% · $76,250
Oscillator, FPGA, custom electronics15% · $45,750
External facility & testing10% · $30,500
Fabrication & calibration8% · $24,400
Data, software, security7% · $21,350
Contingency, IP, admin5% · $15,250

08 · Funding ladder

Founder / pre-seed

Reach B3 (hidden-shortcut detection) and, with facility help, B5.

$75k – $150k

NSF SBIR/STTR — Scientific Instrumentation

Phase I: instrumentation build and the audit pipeline.

target up to $305k

Strategic deep-tech / quantum / instrumentation angels

Bridge to a dedicated Golden Rig.

case by case

NSF Phase II / Fast-Track

Only if eligible and only if milestones justify it.

up to $1.25m / ~$1.555m Fast-Track

Strategic / venture capital

Only after credible B5/B7 data exists. Not before.

later

NSF SBIR/STTR — displayed deadline

November 4, 2026

24d

Deadline shown for planning only. Program terms, topic eligibility and submission windows must be rechecked directly with the agency before any submission.

09 · Partner targets

Tier 1 target · Brookhaven National Laboratory Quantum Network Facility + Stony Brook NYS Quantum Internet Testbed

The BNL Quantum Network Facility is open to the user community for benchmarking and validating concepts — which is exactly the kind of engagement this programme needs.
BNL/Stony Brook classical control infrastructure uses White Rabbit timing over long-distance fibre.
Stony Brook reports a testbed of six nodes across roughly 300 km of dark fibre with sub-nanosecond synchronisation.

We are NOT claiming our experiment is quantum, and we are not proposing quantum work. What we need from a partner of this class is precision timing expertise, characterised long-fibre plant, calibration instrumentation, and people who have already been burned by timing artefacts. Their scepticism is the deliverable.

Principal experimental physicist

Owns the physical claim and the right to stop the programme.

Precision timing / metrology lead

Owns the uncertainty budget — the most load-bearing number in the whole design.

FPGA / embedded lead

Owns firmware freeze, timestamping and the arming sequence.

Nonlinear dynamics expert

Owns the oscillator substrate and the moving-front regime.

RF / EMI engineer

Owns the channel inventory and the hidden-shortcut challenge.

Independent statistician / red team

Owns blinding, exclusions and the frozen analysis. Paid to falsify us.

Lab / facility partner

Supplies fibre plant, calibration standards and institutional credibility.

10 · Outreach funnel

01Technical brief→

0230-minute scientific critique→

03NDA only if genuinely needed→

04Protocol review→

05Facility feasibility→

06Scoped collaboration / quote→

07Funding support letter→

08Build

Partner scorecard

Independence from us

Metrology expertise

Willingness to falsify

Facility capability

Publication credibility

IP terms

Cost and schedule

11 · Data room checklist

in progress	2-page technical brief	Drafting from the frozen protocol pages.
ready	Theory hypotheses H1–H3	Published on this site and versioned.
in progress	Frozen causal-bound protocol + hash	Frozen-draft v1.0; hash issued at build start.
in progress	Bill of materials	Endpoints spec'd; metrology lines out for quote.
ready	B0–B8 test matrix	Defined on this page.
ready	Synthetic red-team results	Complete and clearly marked SYNTHETIC. Not evidence about hardware.
ready	Alternative models & kill board	Maintained publicly, including everything that failed.
missing	IP invention log	Not started.
in progress	Budget	Planning envelopes only.
in progress	12-month Gantt	Derived from B0–B8; dates pending funding.
missing	Team gaps	Every experimental role is currently unfilled.
missing	Partner letters	None yet.
missing	Funding application	Not submitted.

12 · The kill board

Exact-fabric concurrency unresolved

The toy architecture's concurrency behaviour on the exact fabric remains open. It is not cleared by any later phase.

Activation throughput unresolved

Throughput debts from the concurrency front are still outstanding and still red.

Local nonlinear mimicry not proven unique

We have not shown that the moving-front behaviour cannot be produced by an ordinary local mechanism.

Complete physical-channel inventory requires hardware

The inventory cannot be completed on paper. Until an apparatus exists, the channel list is provisional.

Absolute timing uncertainty requires hardware

Datasheet precision is not measured accuracy. Our uncertainty budget does not exist yet.

Scaling beyond 64 nodes unverified

Nothing above N = 64 has been validated even in simulation at the fidelity the claim would need.

Independent replication: none

Zero external replications of anything in this programme.

Causal anomaly evidence: none

There is no evidence of a causal anomaly. None has been observed, because no measurement has been taken.

13 · Investor story — two-sided value

If no causal anomaly appears — the expected outcome

The programme still produces a precision causal-path instrumentation stack: an empirical channel-inventory and audit methodology, programmable nonlinear oscillator networks with characterised transport, local sparse transport and control architectures with published cost accounting, and timing/audit tooling for anyone who needs to prove that a signal did not take a hidden route. Those are real instrumentation and methodology assets, and they exist regardless of what the physics says.

If an anomaly candidate survives

It proceeds through the verification ladder — independent timing, an independently assembled apparatus, then external replication — before any extraordinary claim is made by anyone. There is no version of this programme in which a single rig's result becomes a announcement.

14 · What we will not claim

No faster-than-light travel or signalling

No wormholes

No altered or engineered spacetime

No proof about consciousness

No quantum signalling (standard quantum theory is no-signaling)

No new law of physics, absent replicated evidence

15 · Origin · why we asked the question

speculative · not established physics

The question was provoked by information-first framings of reality — the Thomas Campbell-style idea that what we experience is better modelled as information than as substance. Those ideas are SPECULATIVE and NOT ESTABLISHED PHYSICS. They are not evidence, they are not cited as support, and nothing in this programme depends on them being true.

Our scientific translation is narrow and testable: imagination chooses the question; measurement chooses the answer. A speculative framing is allowed to suggest what to measure. It is never allowed to influence what the measurement says.

16 · SEEKING

Experimental physics partner

Precision timing / metrology partner

FPGA / electronics engineer

Facility access

$150k pre-seed or partner-assisted capital

NSF Phase I collaboration

If you can falsify this design faster than we can, that is the most valuable thirty minutes anyone could give us.

Contact the programme →